Checking and Rechecking

There is ample warning from professional genealogists to check and cite the source of your records correctly. Therefore, I try to find my own records as much as possible rather than using someone else’s tree for the same family. It is rather frustrating when you find that they are for the main part accurate but I still feel better about at least checking things. You run into problems most times because of naming patterns. The son being named after the father for instance. That can also be a help because names tend to run in families. There is also a problem created by indexed records which may contain errors through transcription and the interpretation of at times illegible handwriting.

Like most people with the Beauchamp name in Quebec, I knew the pioneers in the family were Pierre, Jacques and Jean. Comparing trees, I saw that I had the wrong line going fairly far back. At that point I had to start checking and double checking to see how many people had the same line going. That would be the line connecting to Damase my great-grandfather. So I would use them as a framework and check each person as I went. Then I hit the Joseph’s in the family. Not fun. There is the name they were called and the name they were baptized with. I was thrilled to see a whole family of voyageurs. I had found records of two brothers I know are in my family,  Jacques and Pierre Beauchamp who were voyageurs. Many men had to supplement their income by transporting goods and furs along the rivers of New France.  They were two generations back and one of them was called Damase.

There are, of course, many resources for Quebec genealogy which you can find at Cyndi’s list.  Ancestry is so good at joining things up for you, the index and the original. That is a help because if you are able to actually read the original you will get extra information. So, by looking at the orginal baptismal records, I found out that the two Joseph’s were called by their second names of Theophile and Isaac . Then I started cross-checking with the records at PRDH from the University of Montreal. That is a paying site as well but with a little information you can save some money by looking for the union or family of two known ancestors. They have been kind enough to list the couple with their parents, date and place of marriage along with their children’s information. That costs 17¢ (providing you know who you are looking for). Pretty cool! Then you can go from there.There is also a tree at Nos Origines, another site that is fairly well done. So you can see I am right in the middle of it now. What fuels me? The history of the place and times my ancestors lived in and knowing I am part of that. And the memory of my grandparents.

An Eloquent Racism

If you are Canadian, you may have grown up with a subliminal awareness of the differences between us and our American neighbors. You would be hard-pressed to find it described more eloquently than in the writings of Francis Parkman. Parkman was the son of a wealthy Boston family who attended Harvard. He spent time living with the Sioux in 1846  where he saw the effects of disease and alcoholism. He also suffered from ill health and lived through the Civil War.  His descriptions of native people and pioneering French  are a bit jarring though he does make feeble attempt to counter that along the way. To some degree it was like reading a western novel. All his books are wonderfully descriptive especially of the forest environment which was his passion.

From The Conspiracy of Pontiac and the Indian Wars (published in 1887) ;
With steady and well ordered march, the troops advanced into the great labyrinth of woods which shadowed the eastern borders of the river. Rank after rank vanished from site. The forest swallowed them up and the silence of the wilderness sank down once more on the shores of the Monongahela.”

His descriptions of  “the Indian”,
” … Some races, like some metals, combine the greatest flexibility with the greatest strength. But the Indian is hewn out of a rock. You can rarely change the form without destruction of the substance . . . . . it is this fixed and rigid quality which has proved his ruin. He will not learn the arts of civilization, and he and his forest must perish together.”
He is never jovial in his cups, and maudlin sorrow or maniacal rage is the sole result of his potations.”

Then the author redeems himself,
And our interest increases when we discern in the unhappy wanderer the germs of heroic virtues mingled among his vices,  — a hand bountiful to bestow as it is rapacious to seize,  and even in extremest famine,  imparting its last morsel to a fellow-sufferer;  a heart which,  strong in friendship as in hate, thinks it not too much to lay down life for its chosen comrade;  a soul true to its own idea of honor, and burning with an unquenchable thirst for greatness and renown.”

He is trained to conceal passion and not subdue it. . . . . This shallow self-mastery serves to give dignity to public deliberation and harmony to social life.  Wrangling and quarrel are strangers to an Indian dwelling.”

He looks up with admiring reverence to the sages and heroes of his tribe;  and it is this principal, joined to the respect for age, springing from the patriarchal element in his social system, which, beyond all others,  contributes union and harmony to the erratic members of an Indian community.” 

He is able to distill down a description of the differences between the French and English colonies.
In the valley of the St. Lawrence, and along the coasts of the Atlantic,  adverse principles contended for the mastery.  Feudalism stood arrayed against Democracy;  Popery against Protestantism;  the sword against the ploughshare.  The priest, the soldier, and the noble, ruled in Canada.  The ignorant light-hearted peasant knew nothing and cared nothing about popular rights and civil liberties. Born to obey, he lived in contented submission, without the wish or the capacity for self-rule. “

“The settlements along the margin of the St.Lawrence were like a camp, where an army lay at rest, ready for the march or the battle, and where war and adventure, not trade and tillage, seemed the chief aims of life. . . . . Over every cluster of small white houses glittered the sacred emblem of the cross. . . . .and in the towns and villages, one met at each moment the black robe of the Jesuit, the gray garb of the Recollet, and the formal habit of the Ursuline nun.”

“Buoyant and gay, like his ancestry of France, he made the frozen wilderness ring with merriment, answered the surly howling of the pine forest with peals of laughter, and warmed with revelry the groaning ice of the St. Lawrence. Careless and thoughtless, he lived happy in the midst of poverty, content if he could but gain the means to fill his tobacco-pouch, and decorate the cap of his mistress with a ribbon. The example of a beggared nobility, who proud and penniless, could only assert their rank by idleness and ostentation, was not lost upon him. “

Again, the author admits to some redemption when he writes that the Canadian is ” a rightful heir to French bravery and French restlessness “,  and found  “ ample scope in the service of the fur-trade, the engrossing occupation and chief source of income to the colony.” He states that the fur-trade engendered a peculiar class of restless “bush-rangers” more akin to Indians than white man which allowed him to explore and gain for France tremendous territory, establishing forts and missions all through the western wilderness.  Surrounding these outposts, were small villages of Canadians who lived under their protection. Here agriculture was given up to the fur-trade and the “restless, roving Canadians, scattered abroad on their wild vocation, allied themselves to Indian women and filled the woods with a mongrel race of bushrangers.

Meanwhile the English settlers below them, burgeoned and grew in industry but “the independence of authority, which were the source of their increase, were adverse to that unity of counsel and promptitude of action which are the soul of war. In Canada, “the priest and the soldier went hand in hand; and the cross and the fleur de lis were planted side by side.” 

Research Notes-June 10/2016

Yesterday, I listened to a podcast at Maple Stars and Stripes who was hosting Anne Mordell of The French Genealogy Blog. She pointed out that there has been so much research done on the original families of Quebec that it may possible that you will find all you need about your family without going over to France, though I would never let that little thing get in the way! They mainly covered the archives of France and how to approach them, most of the information which is contained in her book, French Genealogy from Afar.  The host, Sandra Goodwin, has a very American attitude though I believe her mother is French Canadian. Very forthright. I found the contrast between the two women’s personalities quite archetypal. Anne had mentioned how to approach the mayoral office of the small French communities by being prepared before you go and perhaps presenting them with a small presentation on your family. I thought I was going to hear a “what!” there for a moment. That being said I cannot help but siding with the Americans on one thing, if I am giving you my money YOU are the one who needs to be considerate of my wishes, barring rudeness of course. But we Canadians are known for our politeness anyway. It does make sense to be prepared otherwise you would be wasting your own money. My experience with genealogy is that it is still to some degree filled with that old moray of “my Dad’s better than your Dad”. I have been to so many meetings where the people, especially the older generation won’t even talk to you. I find the Americans to be much more open and willing than anywhere else.

That being said, Anne does have clinics on her website for your “brick walls” and said that if she gets enough of them she will return for a podcast. Which got me to thinking of the numerous brick walls I have. The French one being whether the family were indeed Protestant, which is hard to tell in Canada because you had to be Catholic to get into Montreal and there were workers hired who were Protestant. Most of the skilled tradesmen were Huguenot in France.

I thought I would just do another search for the last of the Beauchamp line, one Marc Beauchamp. Nothing on ancestry, nothing on Family Search. But after playing around with names I came upon a page that might have made the connection between the two names Deschamps and Beauchamp which seem to confusingly be passed back and forth the further back we go. This time it was a baptismal registration in Sedan, Ardennes, containing the names of Libauchamp and Deschamps. As below. Fairly far back as records show and another indication of Protestantism in that family.

Libauchamp-Deschamps Link.JPG

This below is a Protestant registration of Lea Deschamps daughter of Francois. Again, showing that name as Protestant.

Deschamps on the Protestant registry

So the question really is, did the Beauchamp family use St. Marguerite church in La Rochelle in place of their own church as was commonly done at the time? Time will tell. In the meantime, I am simply enthralled with the story of my ancestors. I can’t believe that they were present during much of what I am writing about. You get a sense of how bad it can be when people want to emigrate to a country where they are roasted on spits by the natives! Oh no, Canada was not the benign land it is today.

 

 

Connecting the Dots

So, why would I write about the Cardinal anyway? For one, he helped to found Montreal through the Compagnie des Cents Associes and supported Samuel de Champlain in establishing colonies there. Further to that, there are many indications that the family Beauchamp were caught up in the Seige of La Rochelle, as below.

Jacques F.O.

File for Jacques Beauchamp

Once again, we note that the brothers, Pierre, Jacques and Jean’s maternal grandparents were married at the Great Temple of La Rochelle. It is unlikely that Catholics would marry into Protestant families. Next, the boys father, Michel, was gardener at the New Town (on the original record as Villeneuve. After the seige, the Protestants were given land for a new church by the King outside La Rochelle. Would a Catholic work there?  After the siege it is unlikely. In 1630, after the Huguenot temple is demolished, the grandparents Jean and Louise disappear from the records, they are listed as burials at sea or in unknown graves.

The name of Jean Beauchamp is registered with the National Huguenot Society as a Huguenot ancestor, so we know that the surname Beauchamp was associated with the dissenters.

Jean B. Huguenot Registration

Jean Beauchamp Huguenot Registratio

This is a record from Emigration Rochelais en Nouvelle France.

Beauchamp Family-Emigration Rochelais Un Nouvelle France

Beauchamp Family-Emigration Rochelais Un Nouvelle France.JPG Noms Isoles

We see the name Deschamps used by the older ancestors which is switched out to Beauchamp by Michel. So, his parents die rather mysteriously and he changes his name.  There is a record of Jean Deschamps as sitting on the Council of La Rochelle under Jean Guiton the mayor of the city during the Seige.

Jean Deschamps Secretary to the Protestant Council-g.bks. L de R..JPG 2\Jean Deschamps Secretary to the Protestant Council-g.bks. L de R.

This is from the book by A.M.Paul Marchegay ” Le Seige de La Rochelle”. The previous records state that Jean died in Nantueil so how he got onto the list of  unknown burials one can only imagine. The facts remain to be seen, but we can be certain that whatever their religion, the family would indeed have suffered by being at La Rochelle during the seige. However, since the Jacques and Marie Beauchamp arrived here as recruits of Jeanne Mance, we will assume they were Catholic by 1659 the year of their arrival at Montreal on the Saint Andre.

A Glimpse of the Real Past

As you know I am an avid history reader and have just finished Cardinal de Richelieu by Eleanor C. Price. At the same time I have been following the new series “Musketeers”. Of course, everyone knows that the series is a rather creative look at the lives of the Musketeers, Louis XIII and of course Richelieu, played brilliantly by Peter Capaldi.  It is swashbuckling fun. By coincidence, I hit a small section at the end of the book where Ms. Price talks about Richelieu on his death bed.

” Louis XIII, himself too ill and depressed to enjoy his hunting as usual, was pestered by Chavigny and de Noyers with messages from the Eminentissime, insisting on the disgrace of four of his best-liked officers- among whom was M. de Troisville, or Treville, the famous captain of musketeers-whose only crime was that they had formerly been friends of Cinq-Mars, and that Richelieu feared their hatred and their influence. The King resisted long, but at last, by sheer angry obstinacy, the Cardinal gained his point, and the four gentlemen were dismissed from the Court, though not from the army; the King showing “great displeasure, even to shedding of tears”.

Richelieu was anxious to finish off what ever business he had before his death and was at this point demented with pain. Louis himself was ill. At one point, Louis was brought in his bed to Richelieu to discuss the Spanish treaty and the fate of Cinq Mars, a former favorite of the King turned traitor.

A “mousquetaire” of course, was a soldier armed with a musket, in this case, part of the king’s body guards.  I am sure there are much better references for the life of a musketeer and their relationship with the King than Dumas’s novel. It is rather sad to think that all the next generation may know is what they see on TV. My take? Truth is more often stranger than fiction ( and a lot more exciting)!

Serendipity

I was looking for information on the Huguenots today when I came across the website of the National Huguenot Society in Texas. It had a list on it of all verified surnames of Huguenot families. It happens that Jean Beauchamp was on the list. These are names submitted with documentation to prove the ancestry of the applicants for membership in the Society. How very interesting. There is a book published by the society which I will look for in the libraries and or genealogy societies which lists information about the people. That should be fun.

Jean Beauchamp Huguenot Registration

Jean Beauchamp Huguenot Registration

Horrible Imaginings

Researching the Beauchamp family in France has been joyous and frustrating at the same time if not a little overwhelming. There is so much history in France and I find my self drawn into the lives of the family over there. There were a few new discoveries that traumatized and confounded me. This information I would not have found if I simply went by transcripts but I  instead took the time to read whole records where found.

The first were two excerpts from Emigration Rochelaise En Nouvelle France ( Godbout, Archange,. Emigration rochelaise en Nouvelle-France. Québec: Archives nationales du Québec, 1970.)

les em. Jac.

You will note the words “fille de feu” underlined. Not being fluent in French does make it a struggle at times but I guessed at “feu” being smoke. My over-active imagination went immediately to the siege at La Rochelle and from there to the fact that some of the family were Huguenot. Oh God, was she burned at the stake as a heretic?! To the web!  A hundred horrible images came up for “girls on fire” but finally after persisting and not a little nausea, I hit a woman who had the definition. As usual, I had parsed wrongly and left the last word off, Helie. I knew it was a name but of who, where? What the term means is ” the daughter of the LATE Helie (her father). Just a slight relief, although her parents were Huguenot, her father in some records known as Elie.

Also, in this record, you find the words “parraine” and “marraine” (godfather and godmother) and their status. Pierre’s godfather is “un honorable homme” and a merchant. Marie’s godfather is a cooper. So working class people. We also find out that there was a younger brother, Guillaume (William) who died at age 6.

Jacques is said to be the start of the family in Canada, whatever happened to Pierre who also emigrated I don’t know. In the record, Jacques’ godfather is also Jacques, so we are given another member of the family who is probably his uncle. He married Marie Dardayne in France 3 years before they emigrate and they have boy Jacques who is one year old when they arrive here. We don’t hear of little Jacques after that. Then they have 8 more children in Canada.

Further down the page, we are to be confounded more by this information.

les em. Jac. 2

 

Here you have a family of Huguenots with pretty much the same names as our family, possibly cousins to our ancestors. It almost appears that the family was split down the middle starting on or before the marriage of Marie Roullet’s parents. The information is out there somewhere I am sure.

I had originally thought that there were no signs of the family intermarrying with the natives, that based on the fact that all names were French and yes, I should have known better. My grandfather, down the line from this family, married a Daigneault (my grandmother)  who is listed on the 1906 Canada census as Cree along with the rest of her family. I did think that was a little strange. HOWEVER, I came across a website,metis-history.info by searching for Pierre Beauchamp,the oldest brother. I hit two boys in there who were I believe, the sons of Jacques senior, Pierre b. 1676 and Jacques born 1678. They were listed as “canotier” which I take as voyageurs. They arrived at Detroit on May 30th, 1706. So another story which totally blends in with the theme of New France, the romanticized  “voyageurs” and “coureurs des bois”. Before they were even born though, land had t be cleared and homes and churches built .